Українська English

ISSN 2522-9028 (Print)
ISSN 2522-9036 (Online)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/fz

Fiziologichnyi Zhurnal

(English title: Physiological Journal)

is a scientific journal issued by the

Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Editor-in-chief: V.F. Sagach

The journal was founded in 1955 as
1955 – 1977 "Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal" (ISSN 0015 – 3311)
1978 – 1993 "Fiziologicheskii zhurnal" (ISSN 0201 – 8489)
1994 – 2016 "Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal" (ISSN 0201 – 8489)
2017 – "Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal" (ISSN 2522-9028)

Fiziol. Zh. 2026; 72(3): 34-40


Bacteriological and biochemical features of peritonitis in perforative pyloroduodenal ulcer

I.V. Kolosovych, I.V. Hanol

  1. Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/fz72.03.034


Abstract

Despite a wide range of available surgical interventions, the optimal strategy for perforated pyloroduodenal ulcers, including cases combined with other complications, remains undetermined. The use of conventional techniques in patients with peritonitis is often associated with purulent-septic complications. The aim of the work was to investigate the pathophysiological features of peritonitis in perforated pyloroduodenal ulcer and their influence on the course of this disease. The study included 158 patients aged 20-73 years, divided into three groups according to the duration of peritonitis: up to 6 h (n = 99), 6-12 h (n = 35), and more than 12 h (n = 24). All patients underwent bacteriological examination, measurement of abdominal exudate pH at different stages of peritonitis, and analysis of clinical and laboratory parameters. The duration of peritonitis was found to be associated with a higher degree of bacterial contamination of the abdominal cavity. Within 60 minutes after perforation, the initially acidic gastric contents in the abdominal cavity become neutralized; at an exudate pH of 7, optimal conditions for pathogenic microflora are established. Thus, the presented clinical, laboratory and bacteriological results indicate that during the first 3-5 days of the early postoperative period, the patient' s body continues to fight the consequences of post-perforation peritonitis.

Keywords: pyloroduodenal ulcer; perforation; peritonitis; pH-metry; bacteriological contamination

References

  1. Clinch D, Damaskos D, Di Marzo F, Di Saverio S. Duodenal ulcer perforation: A systematic literature review and narrative description of surgical techniques used to treat large duodenal defects. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Oct 1;91(4):748-58. doi: 10.1097/ TA.0000000000003357.
  2. Kolosovych IV, Hanol IV, Halil U. Role of erosive and ulcerative gastric lesions in the development of hemorrhagic complications in liver cirrhosis. Fiziol Zh. 2022; 68(5): 45-50. CrossRef
  3. Lahes S, Wagenpfeil G, Glanemann M. Are there any dif-ferences in clinical outcome after the surgical management of patients with stomach versus duodenal perforation? Dig Surg. 2025;42(5):220-8. doi: 10.1159/000547869.
  4. Mohamedahmed AYY, Albendary M, Patel K, Ayeni AA, Zaman S, Zaman O, Ibrahim R, Mobarak D. Comparison of omental patch closure versus simple closure for laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Surg. 2023 May;89(5):2005-13. doi: 10.1177/00031348211067991.
  5. Korotkyĭ VM, Kolosovych IV. Pharmacotherapeutic aspects of early postoperative period in patients with complicated gastroduodenal ulcer. Klin Khir. 2002 Feb;(2):15-8. [Ukrainian].
  6. Pang YF, Shu L, Xia CW. Retrospective comparative study of different surgical methods for gastric ulcer perforation: Efficacy and postoperative complications. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Feb 27;17(2):101896. doi: 10.4240/ wjgs.v17.i2.101896.
  7. Pan J, Shen M, Peng S. Application of different surgical strategies in helicobacter pylori-associated gastric ulcers with perforation: A comparative study of short-term and long-term outcomes and complication risks. Ann Ital Chir. 2025;96(1):63-8. doi: 10.62713/aic.3812.
  8. Farahani PK. Laparoscopic wedge resection and omental patch in an elderly patient with acute abdomen: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2025 Aug 1;19(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s13256-025-05476-9.
  9. De Waele JJ. Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2022 Dec 1;28(6):695-701. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000991.
  10. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1299-310. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7705-4.
  11. Kolosovych IV , Hanol IV , Cherepenko IV , Lebedieva KO, Korolova KO. Intrabdominal pressure and its correction in acute surgical pathology. Wiadomosci Lek (Warsaw, Poland: 1960). 2022; 75(2): 372-6.
  12. Ivanchov PV , Bilyachenko MV , Bilyakov-Bielsky OB. Surgical aspects of treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers with combined complications of penetration, stenosis and acute bleeding. Paediatr Surg. 2023; 81(4): 37-42. [Ukrainian]. doi: 10.15574/PS.2023.81.37.
  13. Kolosovych IV , Bezrodnyĭ BH, Chemodanov PV , Sysak OM. Surgical tactics at “difficult” perforative duodenal ulcers. Lik Sprava. 2013 Sep;(6):60-8. [Ukrainian].

© National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, 2014-2026.