ELISA METHOD: PRINCIPLE, VARIANTS, AND APPLICATIONS IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
V.V. Olianin1, V.A. Gorbachenko1, O.O. Lukyanets1
- O.O. Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/fz71.05S.022

Abstract
The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is
one of the most widely used methods for the quantitative
determination of proteins, hormones, and biomarkers in
modern biomedicine. This article reviews the historical
development of the method—from the classical work of
Engvall and Perlmann (1971) to contemporary high-sensitivity
digital and multiplex formats. The principles of ELISA, its
main types (direct, indirect, sandwich, and competitive), as
well as practical factors that influence analytical accuracy—
such as matrix effects, blocking, washing, and calibration—are
described. Special attention is given to recent technological
advancements, including digital (Simoa) ELISA, microfluidic
platforms, and multiplex panels that enable simultaneous
analysis of multiple biomarkers at ultra-low concentrations.
Examples are provided of ELISA applications in studies of
hormonal status, inflammation, stress-induced changes, PTSD,
and neurodegenerative diseases, particularly Alzheimer’s
disease. The article highlights that ELISA remains the “gold
standard” of biochemical diagnostics, and that ongoing
developments in miniaturization, automation, and digital
analysis are establishing this method as a foundation for future
personalized medicine.
Keywords:
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, cytokines, hormones, biomarkers, stress, Alzheimer's disease, Simoa, microfluidic technologies, multiplex analysis
References
- Yalow RS, Berson SA. Immunoassay of endogenous plasma insulin in man. J Clin Invest. 1960;39:1157-1175.
CrossRef
PubMed PubMedCentral
- Engvall E, Perlmann P. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry. 1971;8(9):871-874.
CrossRef.1016/0019-2791(71)90454-X
PubMed
- Van Weemen BK, Schuurs AH. Immunoassay using antigen-enzyme conjugates. FEBS Lett. 1971;15(3):232-236.
CrossRef.1016/0014-5793(71)80319-8
PubMed
- Crowther JR. The ELISA Guidebook. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 149. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; 2000.
CrossRef
PubMed
- Dong R, et al. Advances in single molecule arrays (SIMOA) for ultra-sensitive detection of biomarkers. Clin Chim Acta. 2024; [epub ahead of print].
CrossRef
PubMed
- Zhang Y, et al. Recent progress in digital immunoassay: sensitivity, multiplexing, and clinical accessibility. Sens Diagn. 2024;3:[pages pending].
CrossRef
- Luo D, et al. The application of microfluidic technology in allergen detection: integrating ELISA-like immunoassays on chip. Micromachines. 2025;16:[pages pending].
- Gurkan UA, et al. Fulfilling the promise of lab-on-achip technologies for clinical translation. Lab Chip. 2024;24:[pages pending].
CrossRef
PubMed PubMedCentral
- Harlow E, Lane D. Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1988.
- Wild D, editor. The Immunoassay Handbook. 4th ed. Oxford (UK): Elsevier; 2013.
- Hnasko R. ELISA: Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 1318. New York (NY): Springer; 2015.
CrossRef
- Vashist SK. Advances in ELISA for clinical applications. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(3):672.
- Smith A, Brown K. Troubleshooting guide for ELISA: common errors and solutions. J Immunol Methods. 2021;494:113045.
CrossRef
PubMed
- Mahmoud S, et al. Factors influencing ELISA performance in biomarker quantification. Clin Biochem. 2020;83:20-28.
- Cheng CA, et al. Integrated pipeline for ultrasensitive protein detection in single-molecule array ("digital ELISA") platforms. RSC Adv. 2023;13:[pages pending].
CrossRef
PubMed PubMedCentral
- Yu H, et al. Applications of digital ELISA in neurology, oncology and infectious disease monitoring. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2025;83:[pages pending].
CrossRef
PubMed PubMedCentral
- Fibben K, et al. Automation and microfluidic integration for point-of-care immunoassay diagnostics. Lab Chip. 2025;25:[pages pending].
- Alhajj M, Zubair M, Farhana A. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Apr 23.
- Leng SX, McElhaney JE, Walston JD, Xie D, Fedarko NS, Kuchel GA. ELISA and multiplex technologies for cytokine measurement: current advances and challenges. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2008;19(3-4):163-170.
- Ryznar R, et al. Principal component analysis of salivary cytokines and hormones using multiplex ELISA panels in acute stress response. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:[article number pending].
CrossRef
PubMed PubMedCentral
- [Author(s) not specified]. Heat inactivation and sample handling bias cytokine detection in plasma by ELISA. Sci Rep. 2024; [epub ahead of print].
- Wong C, et al. Correlation analysis of salivary cytokines and hormones in stress and trauma exposure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023; [pages pending].
CrossRef
PubMed PubMedCentral
- Shanazz K, et al. Neuroinflammation is a susceptibility factor in developing stress-induced psychopathology. Transl Psychiatry. 2023;13:[article number pending].
CrossRef
PubMed PubMedCentral
- Mariani N, et al. Disentangling the effects of depression and perceived stress on salivary cortisol levels. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2023; [pages pending].
- Speakman S, et al. Cytokine fluctuation during acute stress is correlated to life-threatening trauma exposure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023; [pages pending].
CrossRef
PubMed PubMedCentral
- Kurihara M, et al. Relationship between cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and automated immunoassay platforms. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024; [pages pending].
- Wang MY, et al. Clinical utility of CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in complex cognitive impairment cases. Transl Psychiatry. 2025; [pages pending].
- Seidu NM, et al. Association of CSF biomarkers with MRI brain changes in cognitively impaired individuals. Alzheimers Dement (Diagn Assess Dis Monit). 2024; [pages pending].
- Mohammadi H, et al. Which neuroimaging and fluid biomarker method is better for early Alzheimer's detection? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024; [pages pending].
CrossRef
PubMed PubMedCentral
- Yang W, et al. Highly sensitive blood-based detection of β-amyloid and tau using digital ELISA platforms. Clin Chim Acta. 2024; [pages pending].
- Therriault J, et al. Comparison of immunoassay- vs mass spectrometry-derived phosphorylated tau biomarkers. Mol Neurodegener. 2024; [pages pending].
- Li H, et al. Blood biomarkers for clinical applications in Alzheimer's disease: progress toward AT(N) profiling. Alzheimers Dement. 2025; [pages pending].
- Gorbachenko V.A., Olianin V.V., Lukyanets O.O. Physiological mechanisms of stress and post-traumatic stress disorder. Fiziologichnyi Zhurnal. 2024;70(6):98-109.
CrossRef
- Ganzha V.V., Lukyanetz E.A. Role of mitochondrial dysfunction in the development of Alzheimer's disease. Fiziologichnyi Zhurnal. 2021;67(1):57-66.
CrossRef
- Shkryl V.M., Ganzha V.V., Lukyanetz E.A. Effect of memantine on calcium signaling in hippocampal neurons cultured with β-amyloid. Fiziologichnyi Zhurnal. 2021;67(2):3-10.
CrossRef
|