Українська English

ISSN 2522-9028 (Print)
ISSN 2522-9036 (Online)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/fz

Fiziologichnyi Zhurnal

is a scientific journal issued by the

Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Editor-in-chief: V.F. Sagach

The journal was founded in 1955 as
1955 – 1977 "Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal" (ISSN 0015 – 3311)
1978 – 1993 "Fiziologicheskii zhurnal" (ISSN 0201 – 8489)
1994 – 2016 "Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal" (ISSN 0201 – 8489)
2017 – "Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal" (ISSN 2522-9028)

Fiziol. Zh. 2007; 53(2): 70-77


Role of cell adhesion molecules inthe modulation of synaptic activity

A.G. Nikonenko, G.G. Skibo

    O.O.Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology NAS of Ukraine,Kyiv



Abstract

Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) can influence various devel- opmental events, including cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Recent advances have provided evidence that in addition to their adhesive properties, CAMs can affect intracellular signalling and synaptic function. This review fo- cuses on the role of CAMs in the modulation of synaptic activity. Some mechanisms are being discussed including one that involve the ability of CAMs to initiate the formation of scaffolds permitting efficient signalling

References

  1. Aplin A.E., Howe A.K., Juliano R.L. Cell adhesion mol-ecules, signal transduction and cell growth // Curr.Opin.Cell.Biol. – 1999. – 11, № 6. – P.737–744.
  2. Arami S., Jucker M., Schachner M., Welzl H. The effectof continuous intraventricular infusion of L1 andNCAM antibodies on spatial learning in rats //Behav.Brain Res. – 1996. – 81, № 1–2. – P.81–87.
  3. Biederer T., Sara Y., Mozhayeva M. et al. SynCAM, asynaptic adhesion molecule that drives synapse assem-bly // Science. – 2002. – 297, № 5586. – P.1525–1531.
  4. Bredt D.S., Nicoll R.A. AMPA receptor trafficking atexcitatory synapses // Neuron. – 2003. – 40, №2. –P.361–379.
  5. Cambon K., Hansen S.M., Venero C. et al. A syntheticneural cell adhesion molecule mimetic peptide promotessynaptogenesis, enhances presynaptic function, andfacilitates memory consolidation // J.Neurosci. – 2004. –24, № 17. – P.4197–4204.
  6. Chavis P., Westbrook G. Integrins mediate functionalpre- and postsynaptic maturation at a hippocampalsynapse // Nature. – 2001. – 411, №6835. – P.317–321.
  7. Dean C., Scholl F.G., Choih J. et al. Neurexin mediatesthe assembly of presynaptic terminals // Nat.Neurosci. –2003. – 6, №7. – P.708–716.
  8. Dityatev A., Dityateva G., Sytnyk V. et al. Polysialy-lated neural cell adhesion molecule promotes remodelingand formation of hippocampal synapses // J.Neurosci. –2004. – 24, №42. – P.9372–9382.
  9. 9. Doherty P., Moolenaar C.E., Ashton S.V. et al. TheVASE exon downregulates the neurite growth-promot-ing activity of NCAM 140 // Nature. – 1992. – 356,№6372. – P.791–793.
  10. 10. Eckhardt M., Bukalo O., Chazal G. et al. Mice defi-cient in the polysialyltransferase ST8SiaIV/PST-1 al-low discrimination of the roles of neural cell adhesionmolecule protein and polysialic acid in neural develop-ment and synaptic plasticity // J.Neurosci. – 2000. –20, №14. – P.5234–5244.
  11. El-Husseini A.E., Craven S.E., Chetkovich D.M. et al.Dual palmitoylation of PSD-95 mediates its vesiculo-tubular sorting, postsynaptic targeting, and ion channelclustering // J.Cell.Biol. – 2000. – 148, № 1. – P.159–172.
  12. Frank M., Kemler R. Protocadherins // Curr.Opin.Cell.Biol. – 2002. – 14, №5. – P. 557–562.
  13. Fransen E., D’Hooge R., Van C.G. et al. L1 knockoutmice show dilated ventricles, vermis hypoplasia andimpaired exploration patterns // Hum.Mol.Genet. –1998. – 7, №6. – P.999–1009.
  14. Fu Z., Washbourne P., Ortinski P., Vicini S. Functionalexcitatory synapses in HEK293 cells expressingneuroligin and glutamate receptors // J.Neurophysiol. –2003. – 90, №6. – P.3950–3957.
  15. Goda Y. Cadherins communicate structural plasticityof presynaptic and postsynaptic terminals // Neuron. –2002. – 35, №1. – P.1–3.
  16. Gottardi C.J., Gumbiner B.M. Adhesion signaling: howbeta-catenin interacts with its partners // Curr.Biol. –2001. – 11, №19. – P.792–794.
  17. Hsueh Y.P., Sheng M. Anchoring of glutamate receptorsat the synapse // Prog.Brain Res. – 1998. – 116. –P.123–131.
  18. Hunt C.A., Schenker L.J., Kennedy M.B. PSD-95 isassociated with the postsynaptic density and not withthe presynaptic membrane at forebrain synapses //J.Neurosci. – 1996. – 16, № 4. – P.1380–1388.
  19. 19. Ichtchenko K., Hata Y., Nguyen T. et al. Neuroligin 1:a splice site-specific ligand for beta-neurexins // Cell. –1995. – 81, №3. – P.435–443.
  20. 20. Irie M., Hata Y., Takeuchi M. et al. Binding ofneuroligins to PSD-95 // Science. – 1997. – 277, №5331.P.1511–1515.
  21. Joosten E.A. Developmental expression of N-CAMepitopes in the rat spinal cord during corticospinaltract axon outgrowth and target innervation // BrainRes.Dev.Brain Res. – 1994. – 78, №2. – P.226–236.
  22. Jouet M., Rosenthal A., Armstrong G. et al. X-linkedspastic paraplegia (SPG1), MASA syndrome and X-linked hydrocephalus result from mutations in the L1gene // Nat.Genet. – 1994. – 7, №3. – P.402–407.
  23. Juliano R.L. Signal transduction by cell adhesionreceptors and the cytoskeleton: functions of integrins,cadherins, selectins, and immunoglobulin-superfamilymembers // Annu.Rev.Pharmacol.Toxicol. – 2002. – 42. –P.283–323.
  24. Kamiguchi H., Hlavin M.L., Lemmon V. Role of L1 inneural development: what the knockouts tell us //Mol.Cell.Neurosci. – 1998. – 12, №1–2. – P.48–55.
  25. Kohmura N., Senzaki K., Hamada S. et al. Diversityrevealed by a novel family of cadherins expressed inneurons at a synaptic complex // Neuron. – 1998. – 20,№6. – P.1137–1151.
  26. Laumonnier F., Bonnet-Brilhault F., Gomot M. et al.X-linked mental retardation and autism are associatedwith a mutation in the NLGN4 gene, a member of theneuroligin family // Amer. J.Hum.Genet. – 2004. – 74,№ 3. – P.552–557.
  27. Minana R., Duran J.M., Tomas M. et al. Neural celladhesion molecule is endocytosed via a clathrin-de-pendent pathway // Eur.J.Neurosci. – 2001. – 13, №4. –Р.749–756.
  28. Missler M., Sudhof T.C. Neurexophilins form aconserved family of neuropeptide-like glycoproteins //J.Neurosci. – 1998. – 18, №10. – P.3630–3638.
  29. 29. Mizoguchi A., Nakanishi H., Kimura K. et al. Nectin:an adhesion molecule involved in formation of syn-apses // J.Cell.Biol. – 2002. – 156, №3. – P.555–565.
  30. 30. Montag-Sallaz M., Schachner M., Montag D.Misguided axonal projections, neural cell adhesionmolecule 180 mRNA upregulation, and altered behav-ior in mice deficient for the close homolog of L1 //Mol.Cell Biol. – 2002. – 22, №22. – P.7967–7981.
  31. Muller D., Wang C., Skibo G. et al. PSA-NCAM isrequired for activity-induced synaptic plasticity //Neuron. – 1996. – 17, №3. – P.413–422.
  32. Niethammer P., Delling M., Sytnyk V. et al. Cosignalingof NCAM via lipid rafts and the FGF receptor isrequired for neuritogenesis // J.Cell.Biol. – 2002. – 157,№3. – P.521–532.
  33. Nikonenko A.G., Nikonenko I.R., Skibo G.G.Computer simulation approach to the quantificationof immunogold labelling on plasma membrane ofcultured neurons // J.Neurosci. Methods. – 2000. – 96,№1. – P.11–17.
  34. Nikonenko A.G., Sun M., Lepsveridze E. et al.Enhanced perisomatic inhibition and impaired long-termpotentiation in the CA1 region of juvenile CHL1-defi-cient mice // Eur.J.Neurosci. – 2006. – 23, №7. –P.1839–1852.
  35. Packard M., Mathew D., Budnik V. FASt remodelingof synapses in Drosophila // Curr.Opin.Neurobiol. –2003. – 13, №5. – P.527–534.
  36. Philibert R.A., Winfield S.L., Sanhu H.K. et al. Thestructure and expression of the human neuroligin-3 gene// Gene. – 2000. – 246, №1–2. – P.303–310.
  37. Polo-Parada L., Bose C.M., Plattner F., Landmesser L.T.Distinct roles of different neural cell adhesion molecule(NCAM) isoforms in synaptic maturation revealed byanalysis of NCAM 180 kDa isoform-deficient mice //J.Neurosci. – 2004. – 24, №8. – P.1852–1864.
  38. Rougon G., Hobert O. New insights into the diver-sity and function of neuronal immunoglobulin su-perfamily molecules // Annu.Rev.Neurosci. – 2003. –26. – P.207–238.
  39. 39. Rutishauser U. Influences of the neural cell adhesionmolecule on axon growth and guidance // J.Neurosci.Res. – 1985. – 13, №1–2. – P.123–131.
  40. 40. Saghatelyan A.K., Nikonenko A.G., Sun M. et al. Re-duced GABAergic transmission and number of hip-pocampal perisomatic inhibitory synapses in juvenilemice deficient in the neural cell adhesion molecule L1 // Mol.Cell.Neurosci. – 2004. – 26, №1. – P.191–203.
  41. Scheiffele P., Fan J., Choih J. et al. Neuroligin ex-pressed in nonneuronal cells triggers presynaptic de-velopment in contacting axons // Cell. – 2000. – 101,№6. – P.657–669.
  42. Schmid R.S., Anton E.S. Role of integrins in the de-velopment of the cerebral cortex // Cereb. Cortex. – 2003. –13, №3. – P.219–224.
  43. Schnell E., Sizemore M., Karimzadegan S. et al. Directinteractions between PSD-95 and stargazin controlsynaptic AMPA receptor number // Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA. – 2002. – 99, №21. – P.13902–13907.
  44. Scholey A.B., Mileusnic R., Schachner M., Rose S.P.A role for a chicken homolog of the neural cell adhesionmolecule L1 in consolidation of memory for a passiveavoidance task in the chick // Learn.Mem. – 1995. – 2,№1. – P.17–25.
  45. Schuster T., Krug M., Hassan H., Schachner M. In-crease in proportion of hippocampal spine synapsesexpressing neural cell adhesion molecule NCAM180following long-term potentiation // J. Neurobiol. –1998. – 37, №3. – P.359–372.
  46. Shapiro L., Colman D.R. The diversity of cadherinsand implications for a synaptic adhesive code in theCNS // Neuron. – 1999. – 23, №3. – P.427–430.
  47. Stein V., House D.R., Bredt D.S., Nicoll R.A. Postsyn-aptic density-95 mimics and occludes hippocampallong-term potentiation and enhances long-term depres-sion // J.Neurosci. – 2003. – 23, №13. – P.5503–5506.
  48. Sytnyk V., Leshchyns’ka I., Delling M. et al. Neuralcell adhesion molecule promotes accumulation of TGNorganelles at sites of neuron-to-neuron contacts //J.Cell.Biol. – 2002. – 159, №4. – P.649–661.
  49. 49. Sytnyk V., Leshchyns’ka I., Nikonenko A.G., SchachnerM. NCAM promotes assembly and activity-depen-dent remodeling of the postsynaptic signaling complex// Ibid. – 2006. – 174, №7. – P.1071–1085.
  50. 50. Thelen K., Kedar V., Panicker A.K. et al. The neuralcell adhesion molecule L1 potentiates integrin-depen-dent cell migration to extracellular matrix proteins //J.Neurosci. – 2002. – 22, №12. – P.4918–4931.
  51. Ullrich B., Ushkaryov Y.A., Sudhof T.C. Cartographyof neurexins: more than 1000 isoforms generated byalternative splicing and expressed in distinct subsetsof neurons // Neuron. – 1995. – 14, №3. – P.497–507.
  52. Ushakova G.A., Berezin V.A., Skibo G.G. Neural celladhesion molecule (N-CAM) distribution may predictthe effect of neurotoxins on the brain // Toxicon. –1995. – 33, №4. – P.577–581.
  53. Vits L., Van C.G., Coucke P. et al. MASA syndrome isdue to mutations in the neural cell adhesion geneL1CAM // Nat.Genet. – 1994. – 7, №3. – P.408–413.
  54. Walsh F.S., Doherty P. Neural cell adhesion moleculesof the immunoglobulin superfamily: role in axon growthand guidance // Annu.Rev.Cell.Dev.Biol. – 1997. – 13. –P.425–456.
  55. Wang X., Weiner J.A., Levi S. et al. Gammaprotocadherins are required for survival of spinal in-terneurons // Neuron. – 2002. – 36, №5. – P.843–854.
  56. Washbourne P., Dityatev A., Scheiffele P. et al.Christopherson K.S., El-Husseini A. Cell adhesionmolecules in synapse formation // J.Neurosci. – 2004. –24, №42. – P.9244–9249.
  57. Weiner J.A., Wang X., Tapia J.C., Sanes J.R. Gammaprotocadherins are required for synaptic developmentin the spinal cord // Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA. – 2005. –102, №1. – P.8–14.
  58. Wolfer D.P., Mohajeri H.M., Lipp H.P., Schachner M.Increased flexibility and selectivity in spatial learningof transgenic mice ectopically expressing the neuralcell adhesion molecule L1 in astrocytes // Eur. J.Neurosci. – 1998. – 10, №2. – P.708–717.
  59. 59. Wu Q., Maniatis T. A striking organization of a largefamily of human neural cadherin-like cell adhesion genes// Cell. – 1999. – 97, №6. – P.779–790.
  60. 60. Yamagata M., Weiner J.A., Sanes J.R. Sidekicks: syn-aptic adhesion molecules that promote lamina-specificconnectivity in the retina // Ibid. – 2002. – 110, №5. –P.649–660

© National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, 2014-2024.