Українська English

ISSN 2522-9028 (Print)
ISSN 2522-9036 (Online)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/fz

Fiziologichnyi Zhurnal

is a scientific journal issued by the

Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Editor-in-chief: V.F. Sagach

The journal was founded in 1955 as
1955 – 1977 "Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal" (ISSN 0015 – 3311)
1978 – 1993 "Fiziologicheskii zhurnal" (ISSN 0201 – 8489)
1994 – 2016 "Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal" (ISSN 0201 – 8489)
2017 – "Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal" (ISSN 2522-9028)

Fiziol. Zh. 2006; 52(3): 78-83

Development of visceral pain under influence of the nociceptive stimule and geneticfactors

B. S. Sushko

    O.O.Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology National Academy ofSciences of Ukraine, Kyiv



Abstract

The experimental research of painful behavioural reaction on nociceptive visceral stimulus with outinbred white and of the C57BL/6J and CBA/ CaLac genetic strains of mice was carried out. In- fluence of intraperitoneal administration of the dif- ferent volumes and concentration of acetic acid so- lution on visceral painful behavioural reaction at these animals was shown. It was found that CBA/ CaLac had a higher intensity of visceral painful behavioural reaction (on 32 %), than C57BL/6J strain. Comparison of intensity of behavioural reactions to a somatic pain in these animals (the formalin test) has shown that at CBA/CaLac this intensity was lower by 48.5 % than in C57BL/6J strain. Such distinctions in the character of behavioural reactions on so- matic and visceral pain may be caused by features of the func- tional organization of the brain central structures participating in the formation of visceral and somatic reflexes at these two genetic strains.

Full text: (PDF, in Ukrainian)

References

  1. Аршавский И. А. Физиологические механизмы и закономерности индивидуального развития. – М.: Наука, 1982. – 268 с.
  2. Бландова З. К., Душкин В. А., Малашенко А. М. и др. Линии лабораторных животных для медико-биологи- ческих исследований. – М.: Наука, 1983. – 192 с.
  3. Коплик Е. В. Метод определения критерия устойчи- вости крыс к эмоциональному стрессу // Вестн. новых мед. технологий. – 2002. – 9, № 1. – С. 16–18.
  4. Кодряшова Н. Н., Сытников А. П. Effect of emotionality, exploratory activity and pain sensitiv- ity on manifestation of agonistic behavior in the mouse // Журн. высш. нерв. деятельности им. И.П. Павлова. –1986. – 36, № 4. – С. 686–691.
  5. Лиманский Ю. П. Рефлексы ствола головного мозга. – К.: Наук. думка, 1987. – 240 с.
  6. Сушко Б. С., Будак А. В. Особливості больової реакції та чутливості тварин різних генетичних груп // Фізіол. журн. – 2004. – 50, № 2. – С. 75–79.
  7. Черниговский В. В. Интероцепция. – Л.: Наука, 1985. – 413 с.
  8. Юматов Е. А., Мещеряков О. Л. Прогнозирование устойчивости к эмоциональному стрессу на основе индивидуального тестирования поведения // Журн. высш. нерв. деятельности им. И.П. Павлова. – 1990. –40, № 3. – С. 575.
  9. 9. Avgustinovich D. F., Lipina T. V., Kudriavtseva N. N. Response of the serotoninergic brain system to social stress of various duration in male mice C57BL/6J and CBA/Lac // Ross. Fiziol. Zh. Im. I. M. Sechenova. –2001. – 87, № 4. – P. 532–542.
  10. 10. Belzung C., El Hage W., Moindrot N., Griebel G. Be- havioral and neurochemical changes following preda- tory stress in mice // Neuropharmacology. – 2001. – 41, № 3. – P. 400–408.
  11. Daughters R. S., Rivard, R., Simone D. A., Reichert J. A. Peripheral and preemptive opioid antinociception in a mouse visceral pain model // Pain. – 2001. – 89, № 2–3. – P. 221–227.
  12. Ferraro T.N., Golden G.T., Smith G.G. et al. Mouse strain variation in maximal electroshock seizure thresh- old // Brain Res. – 2002. – 936, № 1–2. – P. 82–86.
  13. Garcia-Nicas E., Cervero F., Martinez-Caro L., Laird J. M. A new model of visceral pain and referred hype- ralgesia in the mouse // Pain. – 2001. – 92, № 3. – P. 335–342.
  14. Gebhart G. F., Joshi S. K. Visceral pain // Current review of pain. – 2000. – 4, №6. – P. 499–506.
  15. Kawashima N., Fugate J., Kusnecov A. Immunologicalchallenge modulates brain orphanin FQ/nociceptin and nociceptive behavior // Brain. Res. – 2002. – 949, № 1–2. – P.71.
  16. Ladabaum U., Owyang C. Pathobiology of visceral pain: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications V. Central nervous system processing of somatic and vis- ceral sensory signals // Amer. J. Physiol. – gastrointest. and liver Physiol. – 2000. – 279, № 1. – С. 1–6.
  17. Laird J. M., Olivar T., Roza C. et al. Deficits in vis- ceral pain and hyperalgesia of mice with a disruption of the tachykinin NK1 receptor gene // Neuroscience. – 2000. – 98, № 2. – P. 345–352.
  18. Mogil J.S., Lichtensteiger C.A., Wilson S.G. The ef- fect of genotype on sensitivity to inflammatory nociception: characterization of resistant (A/J) and sensitive (C57BL/6J) inbred mouse strains // Pain. –2000. – 84, № 1. – P. 111–112.
  19. 19. Raffa R.B., Mathiasen J.R., Kimball E.S., Vaught J.L. The combined immunological and antinociceptive de- fects of beige-J mice: the possible existence of a “mu- repressin” // Life Sci. – 1993. – 52, № 1. – P.1–8.
  20. 20. Wilson S. G., Chesler E. J., Hain H. et al. Identifica- tion of quantitative trait loci for chemical/inflammatory nociception in mice // Pain. – 2002. – 96, № 3. –P. 385–391
© National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, 2014-2024.