FEATURES OF APPLICATION OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL PROFILES OF OPERATORS OF UNMANNED AVIATION COMPLEXES FOR THEIR OCCUPATIONAL SELECTION
V.V. Kalnysh1, A.V. Shvets1, O.V. Maltsev1, S.M. Pashkovskyi2, N.V. Koval 2
- Ukrainian Military Medical Academy, Kyiv, Ukraine
- Military Medical Clinical Centre of the Central Region,
Vinnytsia, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/fz69.05.003
Abstract
In order to develop new approaches to the psychophysiological selection of operators, 219 male servicemen aged 20 to
40 years old with experience in operating unmanned aerial
systems of the first class Light and involved in a wide range of
professional tasks were examined. To study their psychophysiological status, modified methods were used using the PFI-2
hardware and software complex. The following indicators were
determined: accuracy of reaction to a moving object, strength
of nervous processes, functional mobility of nervous processes,
simple visual-motor reaction, complex visual-motor reaction,
orientation in space, and visual memory. To identify a set of
informative indicators that can best divide the analyzed group of operators into 3 clusters, a stepwise discriminant analysis
was applied. The technique was developed to obtain several
psychophysiological profiles of vocational aptitude, equally
effective in terms of content. The statistical discrepancy of
these profiles has been established. Ways of evaluating the
superiority of these profiles have been shown. The principle
of “necessary diversity” in the implementation of occupational psychophysiological selection of operators working
in conditions with increased danger has been proposed and
discussed. A number of advantages of using this principle
to increase accuracy and expand the contingent of persons
subject to occupational psychophysiological selection have
been identified. The technology of graphical presentation of
psychophysiological profiles of operators of unmanned aerial
complexes was developed for the purpose of assessment of
suitability for professional tasks.
Keywords:
psychophysiological profile; external pilots; unmanned aviation complex; occupational suitability; functional state.
References
- Matthews G, Panganiban AR, Wells A, Wohleber RW, Reinerman-Jones LE. Metacognition, hardiness, and grit as resilience factors in unmanned aerial systems (UAS) operations: a simulation study. Front Psychol. 2019; 10; 640.
CrossRef
- Corichi EZ, Carranza JM, Reyes Garca CA, Pineda LV. Real-time prediction of altered states in Drone pilots using physiological signals. 2017 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED-UAS), Linköping, Sweden, 2017: 246-51.
CrossRef
Cardosi K, Lennertz T. Human factors considerations for the integration of unmanned aerial vehicles in the national airspace system: An analysis of reports submitted to the aviation safety reporting system (ASRS). 2017. DOT/ FAA/TC-17/25DOT-VNTSCFAA-17-11. URL : https:// rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/12500
- Lim Y, Ramasamy S, Gardi A, Kistan T, Sabatini R. Cognitive human-machine interfaces and interactions for unmanned aircraft. J Intelligent Robotic Systems. 2018; 91:755-74.
CrossRef
- Brady MF, Carretta TR, Shermadou ZS, Gibson A. Aptitude requirements for human operators in human- automation interaction: A meta-analytic review. Aviat Psychol Appl Human Factors. 2022; 12(1): 50-62.
CrossRef
- Doroftei D, De Cubber G, De Smet H. Reducing Drone Incidents by Incorporating Human Factors in the Drone and Drone Pilot Accreditation Process. In: Zallio M. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Robots, Drones and Unmanned Systems. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2021; 1210. Springer, Cham.
CrossRef
- Ažaltovič V, Škvareková I, Pecho P, Kandera B. The correctness and reaction time of piloting the unmanned aerial vehicle. Transport Res Procedia. 2020; 51: 342-8.
CrossRef
- Planke LJ, Lim Y, Gardi A, Sabatini R, Kistan T, Ezer N. A cyber-physical-human system for one-to-many UAS operations: Cognitive load analysis. Sensors. 2020; 20(19): 5467.
CrossRef
- Shvets AV, Kalnysh VV, Maltsev OV. The influence of occupational environment on formation of psycho-emotional stress among remote pilots of unmanned aircraft systems. Zaporozhye Med J. 2023; 25(1): 23-9.
CrossRef
- Matthews G, Lin J, Wohleber R. Personality, stress and resilience: a multifactorial cognitive science perspective. Psychol Topics. 2017; 26(1): 139-62.
CrossRef
- Sakib MN, Chaspari T, Ahn C, Behzadan A. An experimental study of wearable technology and immersive virtual reality for drone operator training. In: Proceedings of the EG-ICE 2020 Workshop on Intelligent Computing in Engineering, Berlin, Germany. 2020: 1-4.
- Haydar AT. Important issues in unmanned aerial vehicle user education and training. J Aviat. 2022; 6(1): 80-6.
CrossRef
- Qi S, Wang F, Jing L. Unmanned aircraft system pilot/ operator qualification requirements and training study. In MATEC Web of Conferences EDP Sciences. 2018; 179: 03006.
CrossRef
- Mouloua M, Ferraro JC, Kaplan AD, Mangos P, Hancock PA. Human Factors Issues Regarding Automation Trust in UAS Operation, Selection, and Training. In Human Performance in Automated and Autonomous Systems CRC Press. 2019; 169-90.
CrossRef
- Kalnysh VV, Shvets AV, Maltsev OV, Koval NV. Characteristics of the factors that form arduous work among remote pilots of unmanned aviation complexes. UJMM [Internet]. 2023Mar.31 [cited 2023May17];4(1):116-2.
CrossRef
- Wilson GF, Russell CA. Real-time assessment of mental workload using psychophysiological measures and artificial neural networks. Hum Factors. 2003 winter;45(4):635-43.
CrossRef
- Kochina ML, Firsov AG. Multifunctional device for psychophysiological research. Appl Radio Electron. 2010; 2(9): 260-5. [Ukrainian].
- Hill T, Lewicki P. Statistics: methods and applications. A comprehensive reference for science, industry, and data mining. Tulsa, Ok. StatSoft. 2013.
|