Українська Русский English

ISSN 2522-9028 (Print)
ISSN 2522-9036 (Online)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/fz

Fiziologichnyi Zhurnal

is a scientific journal issued by the

Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Editor-in-chief: V.F. Sagach

The journal was founded in 1955 as
1955 – 1977 "Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal" (ISSN 0015 – 3311)
1978 – 1993 "Fiziologicheskii zhurnal" (ISSN 0201 – 8489)
1994 – 2016 "Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal" (ISSN 0201 – 8489)
2017 – "Fiziolohichnyi zhurnal" (ISSN 2522-9028)

Fiziol. Zh. 2014; 60(2): 93-101


Features of the alpha-activity of male and female brain cortex under conditions of divergent thinking

Kotsan IIa, Kozachuk NO, Mamchych TI.

    Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, Lutsk, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/fz60.02.093

Abstract

The main goal of our study was to determine the EEG-patterns, which provide high originality of divergent task solving, defined on the base of alpha-rhythm individual frequency. The dynamics of power and coherence indexes in alpha-1, alpha-2 and alpha-3 subbands during the divergent and convergent tasks solving were analyzed. It was shown that the individuals from high thinking originality group have higher readiness to information perception, which is revealed in a higher depression of alpha-2 and alpha-3 rhythms during transition to rest state with eyes open. During the divergent task processing, an increase in frontal and fronto-central connections in alpha-2 subband was typical for groups opposite in sex and the originality level: for «original» males and «stereotype» females. In alpha-3-band, we observed the formation of level and character changes of intracortical interaction pattern, which was specific for each group and related to the sex of tested individuals and the level of originality of answers.

Keywords: creativity, alpha-subbands, EEG power, EEGcoherence, intercortical interations.

References

  1. Guilford JP. Is Some Creative Thinking Irrational? The Journal of Creative Behavior. Veresen' 1982;16(3):151- 4.
  2.  
  3. Razumnikova OM, Volf NV, Tarasova IV. Influence of motivation on the of cortex biopotentials power changes during implementation of graphical and verbal creative tasks. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat. 2007;57(5):553-61. (in rus)
  4. Danko SG, Shemyakina NV, Nagornova ZhV, Starchenko MG. Comparison of the influence of subjective complexity and creative character of verbal activity on the spectral power indexes. Fiziol Cheloveka. 2009;35(3):132-4.(in rus)
  5.  
  6. Sviderskaya NE, Taratynova GV, Kozhedub RG. EEGcorrelates of information processing strategy changes under conditions of visual imagination. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat. 2005;55(5):624-32 (in rus).
  7.  
  8. Tarasova IV, Volf NV, Razumnikova OM. Brain cortex biopotentials coherence changes during solving of verbal creative task in males and females. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat. 2009;59(2):155-61.(in rus)
  9.  
  10. Martindale C. Biological bases of creativity. Handbook of Creativity. Ed. Sternberg R. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press.; 1999. 137-152
  11. Kozlova WT Development of methods of labil nervous processes detection in intellectual-verbal activity [Thesis abstr]. MGU; 1973 (in rus).
  12. Altshuller GS. To find an idea. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1986.200 p. (in rus)
  13. Klimesch W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews. Kviten' 1999;29(2-3):169-95.
  14.  
  15. Nikolaev AP, Ivanitskiy GA, Ivanitskiy AM. The study of cortical interactions during short time intervals under conditions of verbal associations search. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat. 2000;50(1):44-61. (in rus) PubMed
  16.  
  17. Kotsan IYa, Kozachuk NO. Local synchronization of cortex biopotentials during divergent thinking in males and females. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Lugansk National University. 2009;(2):63-8. (in ukr)
  18.  
  19. Kotsan IYa, Kozachuk NO, Shevchuk TYa, Kuznecov IP, Goshko LI. EEG power features of males with high and low indexes of divergent thinking originality. Tavricheskiy of mediko-biologicheskiy vestnik. 2009;12(4):91-5. (in ukr)
  20.  
  21. Schroeter ML, Zysset S, Wahl M, von Cramon DY. Prefrontal activation due to Stroop interference increases during development-an event-related fNIRS study. NeuroImage. 2004;23(4):1317-25. CrossRef PubMed
  22.  
  23. Roelofs A, Hagoort P. Control of language use: cognitive modeling of the hemodynamics of Stroop task performance. Cognitive Brain Research. 2002;15(1):85-97. CrossRef
  24.  
  25. Shvyrkov VB. The basic stages of system-evolutional approach development in phychophysiology. Psychol Zh. 1993;14(3):15-27. (in rus)
  26.  
  27. Aalexandrov Y, Jarvilehto T. Activity Versus Reactivity in Psychology and Neurophysiology. Ecological Psychology. March 1993;5(1):85-103. CrossRef
  28.  
  29. Heilman KM, Nadeau SE, Beversdorf DO. Creative Innovation: Possible Brain Mechanisms. Neurocase. 01,October 2003;9(5):369-79.
  30.  

© National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, 2014-2019.